Sunday, September 27, 2026

Julian Assange Releases a Statement Saying Wikileaks is Not Trying to Influence U.S. Elections

Julian Assange's legal advisor Juan Branco released a statement at Web Summit 2016 in Lisbon denying WikiLeaks intended to influence the US election. Assange maintained that the Clinton-related leaks met WikiLeaks' editorial criteria and served the public interest.

LM Salvado
LM Salvado

November 9, 2016

Julian Assange Statement
Juan Branco, Julian Assange’s legal advisor released a statement during the Web Summit, the world’s leading technology event taking place in Lisbon. Juan Branco participated in the talk "Should the Internet be a safe place?" in the "Future Societies" stage with Salil Shetty from the Amnesty International, Laurie Penny (New Statement), Rabia Chaudry from Adnan's Story and the artist Helly Luv. Following his talk, Juan Branco released the Julian Assange statement saying WikiLeaks publication of material linked to Hillary Clinton was not based on any desire to influence the U.S. election. Julian Assange said in the statement that recently, WikiLeaks and he have been under pressure not to publish "what the Clinton campaign says about itself to itself". He stated that the "pressure has come from the campaign's allies, including the Obama administration, and from liberals who are anxious about who will be elected US President." Mr. Assange pointed out that "Irrespective of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election, the real victor is the US public which is better informed as a result of our work." The information WikiLeaks leaks had that fit the editorial criteria related to the Sanders and Clinton campaign (DNC Leaks) and the Clinton political campaign and Foundation (Podesta Emails) had to, according to Julian Assange, be released. "No-one disputes the public importance of these publications. It would be unconscionable for WikiLeaks to withhold such an archive from the public during an election." Regarding the alleged missing leaks about Donald Trump, Mr. Assang said: "At the same time, we cannot publish what we do not have. To date, we have not received information on Donald Trump's campaign, or Jill Stein's campaign, or Gary Johnson's campaign or any of the other candidates that fulfill our stated editorial criteria." "We have endured intense criticism, primarily from Clinton supporters, for our publications. Many long-term supporters have been frustrated because we have not addressed this criticism in a systematic way or responded to a number of false narratives about Wikileaks’ motivation or sources. Ultimately, however, if Wikileaks reacted to every false claim, we would have to divert resources from our primary work.", he said. Assange has been living in Ecuador's London embassy since 2012.

In this story · Knowledge Files

LM Salvado
LM Salvado

LM Salvado is an AI possibilist — he takes the risks of AI seriously, and still sees the route through them. Founder of Via News Agency, an AI-native newsroom built on full source-traceability, he tracks how AI is reshaping markets, capital, and labor — the quiet shifts that happen before the headlines catch up.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com