Sunday, September 27, 2026

Internet Scam: The FDC Warns That Crooks Follow Money and Headlines

Michelle Switzer

December 26, 2017

Girl on the Internet using social media. Photo by: Walton LaVonda, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NEW YORK (ViaNews) - According tot the Federal Trade Commission (FDC), criminals use ingenious schemes to deceive "millions of people every year". Old and new tricks are used to get people to send money or give out personal information. The FDC warns about two things that never change, crooks follow: headlines and the money. According to the FDC, when lawbreakers look for new ways to deceive people, the best options are the intersection between knowing where the money is, and what information people are exposed to, so to be used against them. The list of scams is huge and comes in many forms, employment opportunity, romance, IRS emails, and links that collect data, just to name a few, Michelle Allen is one of the many people who have fallen victim to this crime, “I was offered the job of my dreams, to be an editor and proofreader. They promised to cover the charges of the programs and software I’d need.” From there, they emailed Allen two checks, one of $1800 and one of $1200. She printed them out, mobile deposited them into her bank account and waited for them to clear. “I was then asked to send them via Western Union to someone in Oklahoma,” Allen said. She was new to the ‘work-from-home’ field and didn’t want to seem unaware, so she did as she was told. “I had a weird feeling about it, but I did it anyway,” she said. The next day, Allen received a phone call from her bank, explaining that the checks were fake. “The man in Oklahoma received the money that wasn’t actually there, to begin with,” Allen said. The bank froze her account until the checks posted, and she ended up losing $3000. “The worst part isn’t even the loss of my money,” Allen said. “It’s realizing that a job opportunity I’d love and excel at was a scam.” A reception center who chose to keep their name withdrawn has been scammed this month as well. From an online purchase, their credit card information was stolen, and someone was purchasing goods with their money. They now have to work with their bank to try to recover some of their funds, which can take months. “Do your research,” Allen said when asked about ways to protect yourself. “Look into everything closely that you do online. If a link seems strange, if a message seems a bit off, pay attention.”
What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com