Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Exact Sciences Already 4% Up, Almost Two Hours Before The Market Open

ViaNews Editorial Team

February 9, 2023

Exact Sciences Already 4% Up, Almost Two Hours Before The Market Open

(VIANEWS) - The NASDAQ opens in less than two hours and Exact Sciences's pre-market value is already 4.32% up.

Exact Sciences's last close was $67.82, 19.56% under its 52-week high of $84.31.

The last session, NASDAQ finished with Exact Sciences (EXAS) dropping 1.09% to $67.82. NASDAQ fell 1.68% to $11,910.52, following the last session's downward trend on what was an all-around down trend trading session.

About Exact Sciences

Exact Sciences Corporation provides cancer screening and diagnostic test products in the United States and internationally. The company offers Cologuard, a non-invasive stool-based DNA screening test to detect DNA and hemoglobin biomarkers associated with colorectal cancer and pre-cancer. It also provides Oncotype DX, a gene expression tests for breast, prostate, and colon cancers; Oncotype Test, a tissue test delivering tumor profiling to aid therapy selection for patients with advanced, metastatic, refractory, or recurrent cancer; Oncotype DX AR-V7 Nucleus Detect Test, a liquid-based test for advanced stage prostate cancer; Oncomap ExTra, that provides a complete biological picture of certain refractory, rare, or aggressive cancers; and Covid-19 testing services. The company's pipeline products focus on enhancing the Cologuard test's performance characteristics and developing blood and other fluid-based tests. It has license agreements with MAYO Foundation for Medical Education and Research; and Hologic, Inc. Exact Sciences Corporation was incorporated in 1995 and is headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin.

Earnings Per Share

As for profitability, Exact Sciences has a trailing twelve months EPS of $-5.61.

The company's return on equity, which measures the profitability of a business relative to shareholder's equity, for the twelve trailing months is negative -21.71%.

Revenue Growth

Year-on-year quarterly revenue growth grew by 20%, now sitting on 1.94B for the twelve trailing months.

Moving Average

Exact Sciences's value is way higher than its 50-day moving average of $54.41 and way above its 200-day moving average of $45.73.

Growth Estimates Quarters

The company's growth estimates for the present quarter and the next is 32.8% and 24%, respectively.

Volume

Today's last reported volume for Exact Sciences is 1504053 which is 53.87% below its average volume of 2576440.

More news about Exact Sciences (EXAS).

ViaNews Editorial Team

Via News Editorial Team delivers comprehensive financial news coverage and market analysis from journalists around the world. Our team specializes in data journalism and in-depth reporting on stock markets, business developments, and economic trends.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
The Agentic Takeover of the CFO's Office
Enterprise finance software vendors—BlackLine, OneStream, Numero AI, and Oracle—are racing to embed autonomous AI agents into core financial operations (close, consolidation, reporting), backed by consolidation M&A (Numero-Royu, BlackLine-WiseLayer), fresh leadership hires, and survey data showing nearly a quarter of CFOs plan to boost AI spending over 50%. Adoption momentum is strong even as at least one bellwether (Oracle) sees its stock lag year-to-date, suggesting the market hasn't yet fully priced in the shift from AI-as-feature to AI-as-agent in finance.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Two significantly different EPS values (10.21 vs 2.68 USD_per_share) are reported for Morgan Stanley on the same observation date (2025-12-31). Fact A specifies FY 2025, while Fact B's 'N/A' fiscal period is ambiguous. If both represent FY 2025 annual EPS, these values directly conflict. The magnitude of the difference (3.8x) is too large to attribute to rounding or minor calculation variations. The missing fiscal period in Fact B raises data quality concerns, but same-date observation + same attribute should reference the same period.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,314 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com