Sunday, September 27, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Source document· December 7, 2025

Lilly's Jaypirca (pirtobrutinib) met its primary endpoint in first-of-its-kind, head-to-head Phase 3 study versus Imbruvica (ibrutinib)

View original at finance.yahoo.com
Lilly's Jaypirca (pirtobrutinib) met its primary endpoint in first-of-its-kind, head-to-head Phase 3 study versus Imbruvica (ibrutinib) In addition to meeting the primary endpoint of non-inferiority for overall response rate (ORR) in the BRUIN CLL-314 study, pirtobrutinib achieved a numerically higher ORR of 87.0% comp…
Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • BRUIN CLL-314 data are both novel and clinically significant, demonstrating an improved overall response rate and a favorable trend in progression-free survival outcomes with pirtobrutinib compared to ibrutinib

    80% confidence
  • In the U.S., CLL accounts for about one-quarter of the new cases of leukemia and there will be approximately 23,690 new cases of CLL diagnosed this year

    80% confidence
  • Jaypirca is 300 times more selective for BTK versus 98% of other kinases tested in preclinical studies

    80% confidence
  • Progression-free survival showed a 76% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in treatment-naïve patients

    80% confidence
  • Most adverse events of interest were lower with pirtobrutinib compared to ibrutinib, including atrial fibrillation/flutter (2.4% versus 13.5%) and hypertension (10.6% versus 15.1%)

    80% confidence
  • Pirtobrutinib met its primary endpoint of non-inferiority on overall response rate compared to ibrutinib with 87.0% versus 78.5% (p<0.0001) in the intent-to-treat population

    80% confidence
  • These data build on additional results from the BRUIN development program and recent FDA approval to reinforce the medicine's potential to deliver meaningful benefit for people living with CLL or SLL across various disease settings

    80% confidence
  • BRUIN CLL-314 is the first randomized study to compare covalent and non-covalent BTK inhibitors and to directly compare any BTK inhibitors in the treatment-naïve setting

    80% confidence
  • These efficacy results, along with pirtobrutinib's safety profile, offer strong evidence on the role of pirtobrutinib earlier in the treatment course for patients with CLL or SLL

    80% confidence
What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com