Sunday, September 27, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
News articleSeeking Alpha· March 27, 2026

Philadelphia Fed's Anna Paulson sees long-run federal funds rate at about 3.1%

View original at seekingalpha.com
Philadelphia Fed's Anna Paulson sees long-run federal funds rate at about 3.1% [Philadelphia] Hardikkumar Joshi Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Anna Paulson sees the long-run federal funds rate closer to the SEP median of 3.1%…
Opening lines of the source · Seeking Alpha · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • When talking to businesses, there is genuine enthusiasm about AI but also cautious implementation, with big productivity effects likely to mostly lie ahead

    60% confidence
  • Inflation has been above the 2% target for six years, and while significant progress has been made, inflation is still 2.8%, not 2%

    60% confidence
  • The labor market is relevant for evaluating a surge in growth; if unemployment is high, there is more room to be patient, but near full employment makes the calculus trickier

    60% confidence
  • The bar for interest rate hikes is quite high as growth slows

    60% confidence
  • Under a medium-productivity scenario, the federal funds rate would be higher at around 3.1%

    60% confidence
  • In January, she still felt cautiously optimistic on inflation after the latest data and reiterated her view for additional interest-rate cuts later in 2026

    60% confidence
  • The conflict in the Middle East has created new risks to both inflation and growth

    60% confidence
  • The long-run federal funds rate is closer to the SEP median of 3.1%

    60% confidence
  • Iran conflict complicates demand, labor, and inflation outlook

    60% confidence
  • When productivity growth is higher, there are more investment opportunities and stronger demand for capital, putting upward pressure on interest rates

    60% confidence
  • The economic position today is different from January

    60% confidence
  • Under a high-productivity scenario, the federal funds rate would be at the upper end of the SEP's central tendency at 3.5%

    60% confidence
  • Long-term inflation expectations are consistent with 2%, but they may also be a little more fragile

    60% confidence
  • Trends in labor market momentum and wage growth can provide valuable signals about the extent to which a surge in growth is creating inflationary pressures

    60% confidence
  • Under a low-productivity scenario, the federal funds rate would be relatively low at around 2.5%, similar to pre-pandemic levels

    60% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com