Sunday, September 27, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
News articleMIT Technology Review

The robots who predict the future

View original at technologyreview.com
MIT Technology Review - Ai Research Title: The robots who predict the future Date: 2026-02-18 11:00 Source: https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/02/18/1132579/robots-predict-future-book-review/ <p>To be human is, fundamentally, to be a forecaster…
Opening lines of the source · MIT Technology Review · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • In an optimization-driven reality, every life decision is posed as if it were a round at an imaginary casino, and every argument can be reduced to costs and benefits, means and ends

    80% confidence
  • Predictive algorithms represent the system working as intended, not unintended consequences; if an algorithm promotes outrage to maximize engagement and ad clicks, that is because promoting outrage is good for profits from ad sales

    80% confidence
  • The only way to counter harmful predictive AI is through broad democratic control over the means of prediction: data, computational infrastructure, technical expertise, and energy

    80% confidence
  • The ubiquitous, mostly invisible predictive layer grafted onto daily life by profit-hungry corporations is leading to a crueler, blander, more instrumentalized world where life's possibilities are foreclosed, age-old prejudices are entrenched

    80% confidence
  • Societies that rely most heavily on prediction tend toward oppression and authoritarianism

    80% confidence
  • Humans made major scientific and societal advances — clean water, antibiotics, public health improvements, physics breakthroughs, cars, airplanes, modern democracy — without formal systems of rationality or optimal decision theory

    80% confidence
  • Mathematical rationality — the narrow statistical conception of optimal decision-making — took firm hold at the tail end of World War II, when mathematical models proved useful against the Axis powers and convinced scientists they could be the basis for designing the first computers

    80% confidence
  • Predictions are veiled prescriptive assertions that tell us how to act; they are speech acts, and when we believe a prediction and act in accordance with it, it is akin to obeying an order

    80% confidence
  • Working to create less biased, more equitable algorithms will not fix the harms of predictive AI because the algorithms rely on past data that is often racist, sexist, and flawed, and profit incentives will always trump attempts to eliminate harm

    80% confidence
  • The core algorithms developed in the post-WWII period drive the automated decisions of the modern world, whether managing supply chains, scheduling flight times, or placing advertisements on social media feeds

    80% confidence
  • A prediction is a magnet that bends reality toward itself; when the force of the magnet is strong enough, the prediction becomes the cause of its becoming true

    80% confidence
  • Technology is not destiny; humans make it and choose how to use it, and defying uninvited daily predictions may be the most appropriate human response

    80% confidence
  • Predictions can distract us from the challenges of the present; AI promises of artificial general intelligence shift attention away from very real and pressing problems that AI is currently causing

    80% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com