Sunday, September 27, 2026

Turkey: How Majority Reacted to Snap Elections and Why Erdogan Told Europe to “Mind Your Own Business”

Ozge Guzel

April 29, 2018

President of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Photo by : kremlin.ru.
ANKARA, Turkey (ViaNews) - Last week, Erdogan called early presidential elections for June 24. This Wednesday, on April 25, Turkey’s electoral body announced that 11 political parties will compete in the June 24 polls. Even though Turkish politicians campaigning abroad was banned by some European countries, Turkish President Erdogan, without identifying the country, stated:
“God willing, in May, we will hold our first meeting in a closed sports hall in a European country. All preparations are complete”.
Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz objected to the announcement made by Erdogan, saying he would be prohibited from “trying to exploit” Europe’s Turkish communities. Germany, as well, opposed the idea due to security concerns. “Our view is clear. In the three-month period before elections in a foreign country, no election campaigning will take place in Germany,” German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas told reporters in Toronto, Canada. Turkey’s switching quickly to a new executive presidential system was criticised by The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) Monitoring Committee since the legitimacy of the elections was at stake during the period of an extended state of emergency. When addressing the Council of Europe about the legitimacy of the upcoming Turkish elections, Erdogan said they should “mind your own business”. The decision for snap elections annoyed the majority of the Turkish people but their concerns and expectations were disregarded by the state. Recently conducted electoral surveys only focused on the candidacy, ignored whether people agree, or not, with the upcoming presidential elections. When people asked if holding early elections is for the good of the people, 52.64% of the participators answered no, while 34.09% answered yes. Subsequently, when asked why early elections, 42% pointed out the poor economic conditions and the remaining 35.16% regarded that as an attempt to wrong-foot the opposition. The issues such as the economic condition, chaotic foreign policy, the regression in human rights and freedom and so many other factors are negatively affecting the AKP’s political campaigning and electioneering strategies. They have indeed no discourse other than just verbalizing about religion and nationality.

Categories

Tags

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com