Sunday, September 27, 2026

GBP/EUR Bearish By 1% In The Last 21 Sessions

ViaNews Editorial Team

November 17, 2023

GBP/EUR Bearish By 1% In The Last 21 Sessions

(VIANEWS) - GBP/EUR (GBPEUR) has been up by 1.85% for the last 21 sessions. At 10:06 EST on Friday, 17 November, GBP/EUR (GBPEUR) is $1.14.

GBP/EUR's yearly highs and lows, it's 2.703% up from its 52-week low and 2.837% down from its 52-week high.

Volatility

GBP/EUR's last week, last month's, and last quarter's current intraday variation average was a negative 0.02%, a negative 0.04%, and a positive 0.19%, respectively.

GBP/EUR's highest amplitude of average volatility was 0.22% (last week), 0.20% (last month), and 0.19% (last quarter), respectively.

Forex Price Classification

According to the stochastic oscillator, a useful indicator of overbought and oversold conditions, GBP/EUR's Forex is considered to be overbought (>=80).

News about

  • According to FXStreet on Wednesday, 15 November, "US CPI data means that our three-month forecast of EUR/USD 1.02 appears a long way away. "
  • Eur/usd trades with a mild negative bias around 1.0870 area, lacks follow-through. According to FXStreet on Wednesday, 15 November, "This, along with the US bond yields and the broader risk sentiment, should drive demand for the safe-haven buck and provide a fresh impetus to the EUR/USD pair.", "This led to the overnight sharp decline in the US Treasury bond yields, which might hold back the USD bulls from placing aggressive bets and help limit the downside for the EUR/USD pair. "
  • Eur/usd: A pull-back to the 1.0800 mark is appropriate – ING. According to FXStreet on Wednesday, 15 November, "See:The idea of a rate cut cycle for ECB and Fed is an argument in support of higher EUR/USD - Commerzbank"
  • According to FXStreet on Wednesday, 15 November, "(This story was corrected on November 15 at 11:23 GMT to say that EUR/USD reached new highs near 1.0880, not lows).", "Next on the upside for EUR/USD emerges the weekly high of 1.0945 (August 30) ahead of the psychological threshold of 1.1000. "
  • Eur/usd advancing to the 1.1500 level in 2024 is very feasible – MUFG. According to FXStreet on Wednesday, 15 November, "There remains plenty of scope for further cuts to be priced if the activity Data starts to weaken and in those circumstances, EUR/USD advancing to the 1.1500 level in 2024 is very feasible."

More news about GBP/EUR (GBPEUR).

ViaNews Editorial Team

Via News Editorial Team delivers comprehensive financial news coverage and market analysis from journalists around the world. Our team specializes in data journalism and in-depth reporting on stock markets, business developments, and economic trends.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com