Sunday, September 27, 2026

Most European Startups Are Undervalued: Startup Portugal's Director

Elham P.Mohammadi

March 24, 2020

João Mendes Borga, director of Startup Portugal, says most startup enterprises in Europe are undervalued. (Photo by Mauro Sbicego on Unsplash)

Most startup enterprises in Europe are "undervalued", says the director of Startup Portugal, who believes that the local nature of funding in the European entrepreneurial ecosystem makes an investment bubble scenario unlikely.

"I think this is more a US problem than a European problem," João Mendes Borga told Via News in an exclusive interview when asked about reports warning of a potential investment bubble burst in the tech industry.

João, who has been working for Startup Portugal—a public-private think tank that serves as a medium between the government, entrepreneurs, incubators, and accelerators—argues that such an improbability has its roots in the fact that entities in the United States can aggregate funds from North America, which makes it possible to make huge rounds of investment in startups.

"That's not the case in Europe as most of the funds are built around national initiatives or national players," he said, adding that it means very big rounds of investment are not likely to take place in the European startup scene.  

Startup Portugal acts as a medium between government, entrepreneurs, incubators, and accelerators. (Photo credit: Startup Portugal)
Startup Portugal helps design and implement entrepreneurial-related public policies and private initiatives. (Photo credit: Startup Portugal)

According to him, players in Germany, France, or even the UK—which officially left the European Union in early 2020, do not have the capability of doing syndicated rounds of investment as seen in the U.S. "Together we might be able to do so, but not as single countries."

Startup Portugal's director maintains that this is the fundamental reason why a bubble burst as a result of extremely high valuations is not a matter of concern in Europe.

"The valuations can be high but the investments will be reasonably pulled down. And I think most of the European startups, if anything, are undervalued," he said, adding that Portuguese companies, in particular, have "very low valuations" but "I'm not incentivizing a bubble on Portuguese startups".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCWAEeX9fJg

Investment Attraction to Portugal

Asked about the major steps taken by Portugal to bring in foreign investment, the former project manager at Startup Lisboa said devising communication strategies to report the latest developments in the national startup ecosystem to the international audience has been one of the most important measures to this end.

He said sharing the news about the technologies being used in the country, different investment rounds in startups, and scaleups becoming unicorns can give confidence to investors.

Portugal has so far produced three unicorns, namely Talkdesk, an enterprise cloud contact center; Farfetch, a global technology platform for luxury fashion; and OutSystems, a low-code platform for building mobile and web apps.

"I think for many many years what was happening in our community and our local ecosystem was not communicated internally and externally in the right manner and that had an implication for everyone," João said, adding that the pace of developments has increased and more investors are entering the Portuguese market due to improved communication.

João Mendes Borga, director at Startup Portugal (Photo by Via News)
João Mendes Borga, director at Startup Portugal (Photo by Via News)

"Also, we can't be dismissive of having the Web Summit here because that brings people physically to the country," he noted while saying that participants' interaction with people in Portugal creates a "bond of trust" regardless of their experience at the conference.

Sharing the news about developments taking place in the Portuguese startup community can give confidence to investors.

João Mendes Borga, director at Startup Portugal

Lisbon's replaced Dublin as the host of Web Summit, Europe's largest tech event, in 2016 and hosted for two consecutive years. It was announced in 2018 that it will remain the host for another 10 years.

"Investors invest in people and things that they feel comfortable with and are trustworthy. They know there's risk associated with all these things, but they will put money in things that they trust…Having them travel over here… create more trust and they will be keener to invest in initiatives that come from our country," João said.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com