Coinbase Global
Largest US-based crypto exchange with jump in Q3 profit from trading volume
Every fact below is drawn from Via News's knowledge graph and linked to the source document it came from. Nothing here is unsourced. How we source →
Key metrics · each point sourced
Stated objectives
Q4 subscription and services revenue expectation
sourceQ4 subscription and services revenue guidance
sourceCoinbase Q1 2026 subscription and services revenue guidance of $550 million to $630 million
sourceAchieve Q1 2026 subscription and services revenue of $550 million to $630 million
sourceAchieve Q1 2026 subscription and services revenue of $550M-$630M
sourceCoinbase Q1 2026 subscription and services revenue guidance
sourceCoinbase expects Q1 2026 subscription and services revenue of $550 million to $630 million
sourceQ1 2026 revenue guidance
sourceCoinbase expects subscription and services revenue of $550M to $630M for Q1 2026
sourceReclaim $168-$170 support level where Parabolic SAR sits, then work toward $190 Supertrend level
sourceRelationship graph · 179 connections
Where sources disagree
We surface conflicts between sources rather than hiding them.
Both facts claim to measure the same attribute ('stock_price') but represent fundamentally different measurement types: Fact A is an absolute price (163.58 USD), while Fact B is a relative percentage change (+2%). This semantic inconsistency means they cannot both be correct descriptions of 'stock_price' as a single, unambiguous attribute. The time difference (5+ months) is secondary; the primary issue is that the same label describes two incompatible value types.
The attribute 'stock_price' is expressed in incompatible units: Fact A provides an absolute price in USD (163.58), while Fact B provides a relative percentage (3%). Stock price must be an absolute monetary value. A percentage without a reference base is not a valid stock price measurement. One or both values are malformed or from misaligned data sources.
The same entity (Coinbase Global) is assigned two significantly different stock prices: $163.58 and $195.90 (19.7% variance). Fact A has a clear timestamp (2026-07-30 00:00:00), but Fact B lacks one. If both represent the same moment, this is a direct contradiction. If Fact B is from a different time period, the contradiction is less severe but the missing timestamp indicates incomplete or corrupted data, making it impossible to determine reconciliation.