Sunday, September 27, 2026

Portugal Back to Good Fiscal Shape, Says EU

Portugal's budget deficit fell to 2.1% of GDP in 2016, the lowest since 1974, according to the National Statistics Institute. The European Commission recommended ending Portugal's Excessive Deficit Procedure after nearly 8 years.

LM Salvado
LM Salvado

May 24, 2017

Downtown Lisbon - Rossio
According to Portugal's National Statistics Institute, last year's budget deficit fell to 2.1% of GDP, the lowest value since 1974. The European Commission opened the Excessive Deficit Procedures (EDP) on 7 October 2009 for failing to meet the 3% budget deficit limit under EU rules. After 7 years, 7 months and 15 days, on May 22, 2017, the European Commission recommended to the Council to abrogate the Excessive Deficit Procedures (EDP) for Portugal as the country has brought their deficits below the 3% of GDP. The Commission stressed, however, that the country should remain "committed to an ambitious structural reform plan" which should include more efficient public spending, control over health and pensions spending and a response to high levels of bad credit in banking. Brussels also wants to improve labor market policies. The Commission also recommended that the Council close the Croatian EDP. If the Council follows the Commission's recommendation, this would leave only four Member States (United Kingdom, France, Spain and Greece) under the corrective arm of the Pact.
“It’s important for rating agencies to understand that Portugal today is different from the Portugal of 2012. The sustained reduction in household and company debt has been staggering.”
Mário Centeno, Portugal's finance minister
When Portugal was hit hard by the eurozone financial crisis, the 3 major rating agencies, Fitch, Moody and Standard & Poor rated Portugal at junk status. This Monday's European Commission recommendation could now trigger credit-rating upgrades and reduce government borrowing costs. Portugal has urged the EU and rating agencies to acknowledge its economic turnaround as the country now has the lowest fiscal deficit in more than four decades. In March 2017, the country’s finance minister, Mário Centeno, said in an interview that last year’s fiscal deficit would be “very close to 2 per cent” of gross domestic product. “Our economy has also been expanding for 13 consecutive quarters”. “If this is not enough for a country to leave the excessive deficit procedure, you have to wonder what is necessary.”
LM Salvado
LM Salvado

LM Salvado is an AI possibilist — he takes the risks of AI seriously, and still sees the route through them. Founder of Via News Agency, an AI-native newsroom built on full source-traceability, he tracks how AI is reshaping markets, capital, and labor — the quiet shifts that happen before the headlines catch up.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com