Sunday, September 27, 2026

Philippines: Economy Expected to Plummet Further Amid COVID-19

Janess Ann Ellao

March 31, 2020

People wearing masks in the Philippines amid the coronavirus epidemic. (Photo by Vaticanews)

MANILA, Philippines (Via News) – Considered as the “worst shock” to the Philippine economy since the global crisis a decade ago, the economy here is set to suffer more disruptive impacts as its central bank foresees a massive slowdown in its economic growth as the country continues to combat the spread of COVID-19.

The government of this archipelagic country has imposed a lockdown in the whole of its biggest island – Luzon, where its capital Manila and its neighboring well-off cities are to be found. This, its central bank said, “could further dampen domestic economic activity."

As of this writing, the health department here has reported at least 2084 confirmed cases, with death toll pegged at 88. Critics have been demanding mass testing but the Philippine government remains adamant on pursuing a militarist approach by deploying military and police forces on the ground to supposedly keep peace and order amid the so-called enhanced community quarantine.

Globally, governments are working hard to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19 on their respective economies – with a former White House adviser saying that the “near standstill” economy, particularly in the US, may lead to a repeat of the Great Depression.

This will likely hurt smaller economies like the Philippines even more.

No less than the head of the Philippines’ finance department said in news reports that the government is likely to get a $1.8 million decrease in its tax collections. Still, he said the massive infrastructure spending – the cornerstone of the Duterte administration’s economic program – will continue despite critics saying that the country’s economic growth has been at its slowest in the past years.

Before the COVID-19, independent thinktank Ibon Foundation has long said that the continuing neglect of the country’s manufacturing and agriculture sector is behind the slow economic growth in the country. Citing government data, the group noted that the annual job generation, too, is considered as “lowest” in six decades, with only 81,000 in 2017.

On the ground, Ibon Foundation said the impacts of COVID-19 will likely affect at least 14 million families, who mostly have low income and “little savings if any.” The group estimates that about 5.2 million of these households “face the greatest difficulties amid the lockdown and severe disruption to their mobility and economic activity.”

So far, the Philippine government’s economic relief offered is a P27.1-billion response fund, the majority of which will be allocated to boost the tourism industry.

Meanwhile, the Philippine central bank is optimistic that the economy may be able to bounce back by 2021.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com